Learn
The Basics.

By ranking your choices and with several seats to fill, BC-STV gives over 80% of voters an MLA of their choice. By counting so many votes BC-STV ensures that we get fair and accurate results in the legislature. By making local contests more competitive, voters get independent-minded MLAs who can champion their communities.
With BC-STV we will be able to hold our government and our local representatives accountable.
When you vote, you rank your favourite candidates in order of preference. You can rank as many or as few as you want. They can all be from one party, or be from several parties or independents. It is your choice. Parties may run more than one candidate.
Your region will have the same number of MLAs as it does currently and there will still be 85 MLAs across BC.
Elections BC start by counting all first choices. Each candidate needs a minimum number of votes to get elected.
Only if your first choice has been elected and doesn’t need your entire vote or if they have so few votes that they can’t win does your next choice count. Think of your vote like a dollar which you give to your first choice. If your first choice only needs $.90, you still have a dime to go to your second choice. Or, if your district hasn’t elected enough MLAs yet, the last placed candidate is eliminated. If you chose this candidate, your entire $1.00 goes to your next choice.
You will see from the results that over 80% of voters will have an MLA that they chose. Your vote may have even helped elect two of your choices.
The Details:
Some notes:
When surplus votes are counted, a portion of each vote is transferred. If each voter only requires $0.90 of dollar to elect their first choice, $0.10 of a voters vote goes to their second choice. This ensures each candidate or party gets its fair share.
After the votes are cast, Elections BC will publish the results. Your vote will only go to candidates you rank, and will go to your first choice unless they are eliminated.
Some people prefer a simple simple flow chart to see how votes are counted:

BC-STV has been used around the world for nearly 100 years, and is the second most common electoral system in English speaking countries. It has been used in Ireland and Australia for nearly 90 years, and recently Scotland and Northern Island has switched over to it. Voters there find it easy to use and elections are conducted fairly. STV will introduce some new features in elections:
- Most parties will run a ‘slate’ of candidates - usually one more candidate than the party thinks will get elected.
- Since most votes count, parties need to maximize their appeal with voters. They will try to run a slate that represents the whole district, both in terms of geography and diversity.
- In a 4 seat district you’d expect to see 10-14 candidates.
- With BC-STV you have the final choice on which candidate best represents your preferred party or parties.
- You rank the candidates 1-2-3. You can rank as many or as few as you want. They can all be from one party, or be from several parties or independents. It is your choice.
- The province is divided into 20 districts, each electing between two to seven MLAs based on population.
- There are still 85 MLAs from across the province.
- Each region still has the same number of MLAs as they do now; they are just organized in groups to give more people representation.
- Since so many more votes are counted, BC-STV ensures that MLAs will come from around the district rather from the largest centre as they do now.
- Each district will likely elect at least one candidate from the governing party and one from the opposition. Every region will have somebody at the cabinet table. Most voters will have an MLA that represents their point of view.
Find out more about how BC-STV will give a voice to your community. (download .pdf) (.pdf)
- After the polls close, Elections BC looks at how many people voted in that district to determine the ‘quota’. This is the number of votes that a candidate needs in order to get elected.
If you have four seats to fill, the quota is the minimum number of votes that only four candidates can earn. So for example, if you had 100 votes, 5 candidates could earn 20 votes each, but only four candidates could earn 21 votes. Therefore, 21 votes would be the quota.
We use simple math to make sure as many voters as possible get an MLA, political scientists call this the "droop quota".
In most* districts the quota will be around 20,000 votes. That means most MLAs will be elected with equivalent support.
*There are a few exceptions with both BC-STV and First Past the Post. The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that the least populated regions, such as in the North and the Kootenays, must be treated as exceptional circumstances – there are fewer voters in these regions, and therefore less votes are required to elect an MLA.
- Elections BC will then count everybody’s first choice.
- Any candidate who has met the quota is declared elected.
- From a voters perspective the most important thing is that they get their first choice elected. Only once that has happened, or if that can’t possibly happen, does your vote get transferred to your next choice.
Think of your vote as a dollar. If the candidate you vote for only needs $0.90 of your vote, you still have a dime to give to your second candidate. If your district hasn’t elected enough MLAs yet the last placed candidate is eliminated. If you chose this candidate, your entire $1.00 goes to your next choice. - The process is repeated until all seats are filled.
- BC-STV can be counted by hand, however for speed, vote counting machines will probably be used to read the paper ballots just like they are in many municipal elections. We will always have the paper ballots if a recount is necessary, as happens sometimes.
- On the day after the election voters will see which of their choices were elected. They will know exactly how much of their vote was needed to elect their top choice and how much of their vote was left over to help their next choices.
Compare Systems
This chart can also be downloaded: (download .pdf)
| Criteria | The Current FPTP Electoral System | BC-STV, as Proposed by the Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform |
| Accuracy |
Almost always provides distorted election results. Votes are inaccurately translated into seats. |
Results are proportional. Votes translate into seats accurately. |
| The Ballot | You can only put a single “X” next to a single candidate. | You can rank as few or as many candidates as you want, according to your choices. |
| Number of MLAs per District |
Only one MLA per district. There is only one MLA per district, so unless the MLA received 100% of the votes there will always be people whose views are not represented. |
2 to 7 MLAs per district; with most having 4 or 5. There is a much greater chance that most citizens will have at least one MLA who represents their political views. |
| Strategic Voting |
Very Common. Voters often vote not for their favourite candidate, but for the candidate most likely to defeat the candidate they do notwant to get elected. |
Unheard of. Voters can safely vote for their favourite candidate with the knowledge that if that candidate is not elected, their vote is transferred to their second or subsequent choices. |
|
Wasted Votes (Votes cast for candidates who were not elected. These voters have no local MLA who represents their views). |
Common. In the past four elections, an average of 50% of all votes cast do not contribute to electing a single MLA. |
Rare. 80 to 90% of all votes cast lead to the election of an MLA. |
|
Surplus Votes (Votes cast for candidate who was elected but were extra votes not needed to elect that candidate.) |
Wasted. These vote votes are not needed and do not contribute to the election of any further MLAs. |
Effective. The portion of these votes that was not necessary to elect the First choice is transferred to the voters’ second choice and subsequent choices to contribute towards electing other MLAs from the district. |
|
Ineffective Votes (The total of all wasted and surplus votes.) |
Wasted. These votes do not at all contribute to the election of a single MLA in the Legislative Assembly. In 2005, 1,124,266 (64% of all valid votes cast) votes were ineffective. |
Nearly all votes are effective. 80-90% of all votes cast contribute to the election of at least one MLA in an electoral district. |
|
Effective Votes (Votes that actually directly contributed to the election of an MLA.) |
Very few. In 2005, only 36% of all votes were effective in electing an MLA. |
|
| Voter Turnout |
Low.
Turnout for British Columbia provincial elections has declined from 75% in 1991 to |
Higher. While turnout has declined worldwide, it has not fallen as much (and remains higher) in those countries that use STV. |
| Choice |
None. With only one candidate from each political party, a voter has to blindly support their party’s nominee or risk electing another party’s candidate. |
Many. By ranking their preferred candidates, a voter is able to vote for their favourite candidates from their own party, other parties, and independents. |
| Effective Representation |
Poor. Unless your choice wins, you do not have an MLA that represents your political views. |
Effective. With more than a one MLA representing your district, you are much more likely to have at least one MLA representing your political views in the Legislature. |
| Stability |
Unstable. The endless back and forth of majority governments of two ideological parties results in wild public policy swings. |
Increased stability. Public policy has broad support from across the political spectrum, leading to more enduring legislation and less drastic changes when a new government takes power. |
| Party Discipline |
Dominant. Because it is so difficult for independents to get elected, MLAs can only get elected under the party banner. As a result, MLAs must always tow the party line to get reelected, and are more likely to represent their party in the district instead of representing their district in the Legislature. |
Moderate. Because candidates are also competing against other candidates from the same political party, they will compete to provide the best degree of local representation.
|
| Local Representation |
Poor. Because a candidate only needs one more vote than the second-place finisher to get elected, candidates only campaign in the major population centres of the riding and focus their campaigns more on rallying their partisan base as opposed to cultivating broad support. |
Strong. Because candidates are competing against members of their own party and other parties, they must serve the interests of everyone in the district. Candidates must campaign all over the district in order to get as many first choice votes as possible. They also have to appeal to a broad range of groups in the district instead of their narrow partisan base in order to be other voters’ second or subsequent choices to increase their chances of being elected. |
Download Documents
Printable Handout:
BC-STV Printable Handout (download .pdf)
FAQ/Myth Document:
FAQ/MYTH Document (download .pdf)
Brief Sheets:
BC-STV and Women's Representation (download .pdf) - how BC-STV will open more opportunities for women.
BC-STV - A Voice for Communities (download .pdf) (.pdf) - how BC-STV will enhance representation for communities throughout BC, particularly in less heavily populated areas.
Indepth Documents:
BC-STV Electoral System: An intro. (download .pdf)
BC-STV Proportionality Representation Explained (download .pdf)
BC-STV Counting Votes under BC-STV (download .pdf)
BC-STV Compare Systems(download .pdf)
Brochures:
English Version (download .pdf)
Chinese Brochure (download .pdf)